Allahabad High Court
CRLP/3221/2022 of RAJ KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS RAJAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS on 14 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3221 of 2022 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3221 of 2022
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief(s): "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing History Sheet No. 10A, Serial No. 1627 at Police Station-Kakori, District- Lucknow.
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus not harasses the petitioner in pursuance of History Sheet No. 10A, Serial No. 1627 at Police Station-Kakori, District-Lucknow.
III. issue any other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit, just and proper under the circumstances of the case;
IV. Award the cost of the petition. "
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that only on the basis of a single criminal case History-Sheet No.10-A Serial No. 1627 at Police Station-Kakori, District-Lucknow has been opened/instituted against the petitioner. And as such the entire excercise is bad in law and liable to be quashed.
4. Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the said prayer and has submitted that in respect of the grievance raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, he may prefer a representation before the appropriate authority, which shall be considered in accordance with law.
5. Having considered the rival submissions of learned counsel for the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Raj Kumar Gupta Alias Rajan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner may prefer a representation before the appropriate authority/respondent No. 2 highlighting his grievance within two weeks.
6. If such representation is moved within the said period, the respondent No. 2 shall consider his representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
7. With these observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. November 14, 2025 Arvind CRLP No. 3221 of 2022 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench