Allahabad High Court

A227/6120/2025 of DEENA NATH VERMA AND ANOTHER Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P., LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER on 14 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6120 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution the petitioner has sought a direction to opposite party No.1 i.e. Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow for

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6120 of 2025

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution the petitioner has sought a direction to opposite party No.1 i.e. Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow for disposal of revision No.1243 of 2011 (computerized case No.R 201108320044112) under Section 219 of Land Revenue Act filed by opposite party no.2, expeditiously.

2. It has been submitted that the said case is pending for last almost 14 years, as such, a case for interference is made out.

3. Accordingly, opposite party No.1 i.e. Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to consider and decide revision No.1243 of 2011 (computerized case No.R 201108320044112) under Section 219 of Land Revenue Act within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in case there is no legal impediment, in accordance with law.

4. Counsel for the petitioner assures this Court that he will cooperate in the proceedings and appear on each date fixed in the matter and shall not seek unnecessary adjournment. In case, he does not cooperate as above, the benefit of this order shall not be available to him.

5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed of. November 14, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Deena Nath Verma And Another .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lko. Thru. Chairman And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead