Allahabad High Court

A227/6627/2025 of SHIKSHA DEVI THRU. HER SON AKASH DEEP Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P., LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 10 OTHERS on 14 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6627 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6627 of 2025

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.

2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.

3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, to decide Revision Petition No. REV/1078/2008-09 (computerized No. R200915010036532) titled as "Dharmpal and ors. v. Maniram and ors.", expeditiously.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow,, is directed to consider and decide revision No.REV/1078/2008-09 (computerized No. R200915010036532) titled as "Dharmpal and ors. v. Maniram and ors." within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in case there is no legal impediment, in accordance with law.

7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shiksha Devi Thru. Her Son Akash Deep .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lko. Thru. Chairman And 10 Others .....Respondent(s)

shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.

8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 14, 2025 A.Nigam A227 No. 6627 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead