Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11038/2025 of MATSYA JEEVI SAHKARI SAMITI LTD. THRU. CHAIRMAN MR.SHIV RAJ RAWAT Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 5 OTHERS on 13 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11038 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers : "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quash the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11038 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers : "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quash the impugned order/letter no. 1160/र०का०- गाँव सभा dated 24.10.2025, issued by the respondent no.3 i.e. Sub Divisional Officer, Fatehpur, Barabanki, contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quash the impugned notice/letter no. 1164/र०का०- गाँव सभा dated 30.10.2025, issued by the respondent no.4 i.e. Tehsildar, Fatehpur, Barabanki, contained as Annexure No.2 to this writ petition.
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties no. 3, 4 and 6 not interfere in peaceful possession of petitioner over the land gata no.564/7.551 hectare and gata no.563/15.479 hectare, situated at village-Sainder, Pargana- Kurshi, Tehsil-Fatehpur, District Barabanki, in the interest of justice." On an urgency being mentioned, the matter was taken up. Having gone through the impugned order, we find no good ground to show interference at this stage. Moreover, Shri Mohan Singh, who appears on behalf of Gram Sabha has pointed out Rule 59 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules, 2016, wherein the provision of statutory appeal has been provided. The appeal can be filed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Matsya Jeevi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Thru. Chairman Mr.Shiv Raj Rawat .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
before the Collector within thirty days from the date of the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer. This petition is dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Collector in appeal under Rule 59 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules, 2016. November 13, 2025 Mahesh WRIC No. 11038 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench