Allahabad High Court
A227/6621/2025 of PREM KUMAR @ PAPPU Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS on 13 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6621 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6621 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide Revision No. 1190 of 2020 (Computerized Case No. C 202004000001190) - Prem Kumar @ Pappu Vs. Kaushalya Devi and Others U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, is directed to decide Revision No. 1190 of 2020 (Computerized Case No. C 202004000001190) - Prem Kumar @ Pappu Vs. Kaushalya Devi and Others U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
November 13, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Prem Kumar @ Pappu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench