Allahabad High Court
A227/6579/2025 of MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS on 12 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6579 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State respondents and Sri Pankaj Gupta for respondent No.3. 2. Present petition under Article 227 of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6579 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State respondents and Sri Pankaj Gupta for respondent No.3.
2. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:- "to issue an order or direction of suitable nature thereby directing the Court of Additional District Magistrate, Finance and Revenue, Bahraich to decide the stay application dated 30.9.2025 pending under Case No.1119 of 2025, bearing computerized case No.D202508150001119 titled as "Mohammad Ibrahim Vs. Gramsabha" under Section 67 (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a time framed manner, pending since year 30.9.2025, within a stipulated period of time, as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand the respondents are going to recover the damage on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application.
4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer.
5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to Additional District Magistrate, Finance and Revenue, Bahraich to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within next two weeks.
6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter.
7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shankar Lal Pandey, Abhishek Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Mohammad Ibrahim .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. November 12, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6579 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench