Allahabad High Court
A227/6342/2025 of DORI LAL Vs THE BOARD OF REVENUE, LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS on 12 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6342 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to other respondents is dispensed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6342 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to other respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- U.P. Board of Revenue, Lucknow to decide revision No.1062/2015, computerized case No.20151213001062, titled as "Dori Lal (Minor) and another Vs. Ved Prakash Pathak and another" under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act pending since 30.4.2015, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the recall application filed in the case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - U.P. Board of Revenue, Lucknow is directed to decide recall application pending in revision No.1062/2015, computerized case No.20151213001062, titled as "Dori Lal (Minor) and another Vs. Ved Prakash Pathak and another" under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. The parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the application and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dori Lal .....Petitioner(s) The Board Of Revenue, Lko. Thru. Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s)
which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of. November 12, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6342 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench