Allahabad High Court
A227/2988/2025 of SMITA SINGH Vs CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) FAST TRACK COURT UNNAO AND 3 OTHERS on 12 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2988 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The instant application has been preferred by the applicant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2988 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The instant application has been preferred by the applicant for the following main relief:- "(i) Issue an appropriate direction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India direct to the Opposite Party no.1 i.e Civil Judge (Junior Division) Fast Track Court Unnao to decide the Case No-502 of 2022 (Smt Smita Singh vs Anand Pratap Singh and others.) under section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, To Stipulated time Granted by this Hon'ble Court. Contained as Annexure No.1 to this petition. Contained as Annexure No. 1." Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, which was filed under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (in short 'Act of 2005') and also that as per Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act of 2005, the Magistrate shall endeavour to dispose of every application made under sub-section (1) within a period of sixty days from the date of its first hearing, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of case is implicit under Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Pratap Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Smita Singh .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge (Junior Division) Fast Track Court Unnao And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Article 21 of the Constitution of India. With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of. November 12, 2025 Vinay/- A227 No. 2988 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench