Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10466/2025 of SATEESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 12 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10466 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Standing counsel. 2. In light of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. The petitioner in
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 10466 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Standing counsel.
2. In light of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. The petitioner in the present writ petition has assailed the order dated 19.9.2025 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sawayajpur, District Hardoi in proceedings under Section 116 of Revenue Code for partition of the property situated at gata No.768 area 0.4930 hectare in Village Paliya Purv Sisala, Pargana Sandi, Tehsil- Sawayajpur, District Hardoi.
4. Learned Standing counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the against the impugned order the petitioner has efficacious and statutory remedy of filing appeal before Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow.
5. Learned counsel or the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid and submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appeal.
6. In light of the above, the petition is dismissed with aforesaid liberty.
7. In case appeal is filed within next two weeks, the appellate authority shall consider and expedite the appellate proceedings and also consider Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Sateesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
the application for interim relief, if any, moved by the petitioner, in accordance with law. November 12, 2025 RKM. WRIC No. 10466 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench