Allahabad High Court
HABC/408/2025 of SMT. POONAM THRU. HER FATHERI.E. MOOL CHANDRA GAUTAM Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 12 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 408 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The present petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 408 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The present petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:- "i. ISSUE a writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus by directing and commanding the Opposite Parties to produce the Detenue who is under illegal detention of the opposite party no.3 before the Hon'ble High Court and also direct the concerned to hand over the Petitioner/Detenue to the father of the Detenue." Taking note of the facts, as pleaded in the present petition including the fact that alleged detenue Smt. Poonam is living with opposite party no.3/Sri Tarun Kumar with whom the marriage of the alleged detenue Smt. Poonam was solemnized on 23.11.2010 as per Hindu Rights and Rituals and the present petition seeking main relief(s), quoted above, has been filed by Sri Mool Chandra Gautam, who is father of the detenue, this Court finds that present petition for the relief sought, in the nature of Habeas Corpus, is not maintainable. It is dismissed accordingly.
November 12, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Singh, Anurag Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Smt. Poonam Thru. Her Fatheri.E. Mool Chandra Gautam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench