Allahabad High Court

A227/6556/2025 of Mubarak Ali and 9 Others Vs Sub Divisional Magistrate, District Gonda, and 2 Others on 11 November 2025

Cites 3, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6556 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present application has been filed for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

3

Decisions referred to

In this index

2

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6556 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present application has been filed for the following main relief:- "(a) to issue direction to opposite party no-1 to consider and decide the case No.12315/2024 (Computerized Case No.T202408300612315), filed under section 133 Cr.P.C. on 29.03.2024, Israr Ali & others Vs Tayyab Ali, situated in Village- Tulsipur Manjha Pure Dafali, Police Station- Nababganj, District- Gonda with in time frame by the this Hon'ble Court." Considering the facts as stated, particularly the period of pendency of the case, which appears to be pending since March 2024, this application is disposed of with direction to opposite party no.1/Sub Divisional Magistrate, District-Gonda, to consider and decide the pending case in issue, as indicated in the prayer clause, quoted above, most expeditiously as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the application is disposed of.

November 11, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Angrej Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.)

Mubarak Ali And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, District Gonda, And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead