Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10728/2025 of SMT. BHANMATI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS on 11 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10728 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Amit Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 4. 2. The grievance raised by the petitioner is with regard to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 10728 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Amit Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 4.
2. The grievance raised by the petitioner is with regard to nonexecution of the orders passed in his favour by the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Faizabad Division, Faizabad (Ayodhya) dated 31.07.2014 as well as the order of Board of Revenue dated 6.1.2025. He has submitted that on an application given to the respondent no.4, the necessary corrections have not been made in the Revenue Records and therefore a direction may be given to the opposite party no.3, to take a decision upon the letter dated 6.6.2025.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that specific provision has been made in the Revenue Court Manual with regard to the execution of the orders passed by the Revenue Authority in paragraph 460 of the Revenue Court Manual and in case the petitioner moves an appropriate application a necessary orders can be passed for correction in the revenue records.
4. In the light of the above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the Competent Authority under paragraph 460 of Revenue Manual Court and on receipt of the same, the Competent Authority shall proceed decide the matter with expedition. November 11, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt. Bhanmati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench