Allahabad High Court
WRIA/2570/2006 of KRISHNA MOHAN SINGGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU PRINC. SECREATRY SECONDRRY EDUCA. and 5 ORS on 10 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 2570 of 2006 Court No. - 25 HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondents. 2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "(i)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 2570 of 2006
Court No. - 25
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondents.
2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider petitioner for regularization on the post of Assistant teacher (L.T. Grade) R.R.B.N. Inter College, Bhagwant Nagar, Unnao.
(ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents consider petitioner's candidature for regularization/regular appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher (L.T. Grade) in light of provisions of Section 33-F of U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982, treating 30.12.2000 as cut off date for purposes of consideration of regularization.
(iii) To issue a writ, order or direction declaring cut off date August, 6, 1993 prescribed under section 33-F of U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982 as irrational unreasonable and ultra vires of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
(iv) To pass any other suitable order or direction which is deemed just and proper in the circumstances of the case may also be passed.
(v) To allow the writ petition with cost."
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the services of the petitioner have been regularized by means of order dated Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Pandey, Dileep Kumar Pathak, Rajneesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C S C Krishna Mohan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Princ. Secreatry Secondrry Educa. And 5 Ors .....Respondent(s)
20.12.2022 with effect from 22.03.2016, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-SA-2 to the supplementary affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 10, 2025 Shubhankar WRIA No. 2570 of 2006 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench