Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10895/2025 of BAL KRISHNA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 9 OTHERS on 7 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10895 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers : "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10895 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers : "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2, to take appropriate action against the opposite party no.5 to 10 by restraining them not to construct the Kharanja Road over the Abadi Sahan land of petitioner.
(ii) Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties thereby directing the opposite party no.3 to stop the construction work made by the opposite party nos.5 to 10 over the Sahan Land of the petitioner immediately." An urgency was mentioned in the morning for the matter to be taken up, as it was stated that the petitioner was being sought to be dispossessed by the Gram Pradhan of Block Behta, Village and Post Itauva and District Sitapur. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of the State-Respondents and Shri Dileep Kumar Pandey, who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.4. Shri Dileep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.4 has pointed out page no.18 of the writ petition, wherein it is evident that the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of private respondent nos.5 to 10. There is some dispute relating to a narrow passage/lane that exists between the house of the petitioner and private respondents, over which the private respondents are Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pal Singh Yadav, Ashish Kumar Singh, Prathama Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Bal Krishna .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s)
allegedly trying to take forcible possession. This Court is of the considered opinion that the extraordinary jurisdiction cannot be exercised to settle a private dispute. It will be always open for the petitioner to file a civil suit, as the dispute relates to Abadi land. This writ petition is disposed of. November 7, 2025 Mahesh WRIC No. 10895 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench