Allahabad High Court

WRIC/4768/2025 of RAJ KUMAR GUPTA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 3 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 4768 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. The writ petition is disposed of . For orders, see our order of date passed on separate sheets in Writ-C No.2084 of 2025. November 3, 2025 Mahesh Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 4768 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. The writ petition is disposed of. For orders, see our order of date passed on separate sheets in Writ-C No.2084 of 2025. November 3, 2025 Mahesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manendra Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hemendra Kumar Bhatt (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Raj Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead