Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10491/2025 of BAIJNATH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. INFRA. AND INDUS. DEVE. DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS on 30 October 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10491 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.3 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10491 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.3 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. This writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :-
(i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the Principal Secretary Infrastructure and Industries Development Department, Government of U.P., Lucknow (opp. party no.2) to consider and decide the petitioner's application dated 20.08.2025, expeditiously say within time framed period as directed by this Hon'ble Court, as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice. It is the case of the petitioner that his land has been sold by co-tenure holders who had a limited one-third share in the property-in-question to respondent no.3 and they have also received the sale consideration. The petitioner has made a representation to respondent no. 2 on 20.08.2025, which is still pending. He prays that his representation be directed to be decided. The writ petition is disposed of without entering into the merits of the case, with a direction to respondent no. 2 to ask for comments from all concerned and thereafter pass an appropriate, reasoned and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailesh Kumar Pathak, Anju Tripathi, Ashutosh Tiwari, Umesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Baijnath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Infra. And Indus. Deve. Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
speaking order on the representation of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. October 30, 2025 Ashish Dewal WRIC No. 10491 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench