Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10502/2025 of C/M SWATANTRA GIRLS DEGREE COLLEGE THRU. PRESIDENT VEENEET TIWARI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 30 October 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10502 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 5 is taken on record. Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10502 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 5 is taken on record. Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Piyush Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 5. This writ petition has been filed with the following relief :-
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned seizer/kurki proceeding initiated by the Zonal Officer, Zone-5, Nagar Nigam, Alambagh, Lucknow vide order dated 13.10.2025 whereby date has been fixed i.e. 25.10.2025 for seizer/kurki of the property House No.569Ka/477/1 situated at Sneh Nagar, Alambagh in the name of Swantra Girls Degree College, contained in Annexure no.1 to this writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some subsequent developments, petitioner does not want to press this writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. Learned Standing Counsel for the State and learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 5 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. October 30, 2025 Ashish Dewal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) C/M Swatantra Girls Degree College Thru. President Veeneet Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench