Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10306/2025 of KIRAN KUMARI AND 2 OTHERS Vs U.O.I DEPTT. OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS NEW DELHI THRU. ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL TELECOM AND 5 OTHERS on 17 October 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10306 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned DSG Shri S.B. Pandey, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Varun Pandey and Shri Avnish Kumar Singh, learned
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10306 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned DSG Shri S.B. Pandey, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Varun Pandey and Shri Avnish Kumar Singh, learned counsel who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of LDA. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties concerned not to get made/ installing/ erecting/ constructing any telecom/ cellular mobile tower or any other tower - like telecom infrastructure on the plot of the opposite party no.6, situated adjacent to the house and plot of petitioners at Astha Nagar, Deva Road Ganeshpur Rahmanpur, Chinhat, Lucknow, in the interest of justice.
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties concerned to consider and decide the application of the petitioner dated 08.10.2025 expeditiously within the stipulated time as provided by this Hon'ble Court contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition."
Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on an order passed by this Court in Writ C No.9066 of 2025 [Sanjay Kumar Rai and 4 Others vs. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra Kiran Kumari And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I Deptt. Of Telecommunications New Delhi Thru. Its Director General Telecom And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
U.O.I. Deptt of Telecommunications New Delhi Thru Director Telecom and Others]. We find in the said writ petition rules were challenged, however, in the instant writ the rules are not challenged. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner says that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. October 17, 2025 mks WRIC No. 10306 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench