Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10438/2025 of SUNIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS on 17 October 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10438 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondents. This petition has been filed by the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10438 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondents. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayers : "(i) An order or direction, writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned notice dated 15.02.2024 issued under Sections 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Act, 1965, insofar as they relate to the petitioner's land bearing Khasra Nos. 288, 296, 317, and 320, being void ab initio, annexed hereto as Commiss stant Annexure No. 1 to the instant writ petition.
(ii) . An order or direction, writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned notice dated 09.04.2024 issued under Sections 29 of the Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Act, 1965, insofar as they relate to the petitioner's land bearing Khasra Nos. 288, 296, 317, and 320, being void ab initio, annexed hereto as Annexure No. 3 to the instant writ petition." Learned counsel for the petitioner, while explaining the delay in filing the petition, submits that the petitioner was never served any notice under Section 28 or Section 29 of the U. P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Act, 1965, however, there are no such pleadings on record. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. October 17, 2025 Mahesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Nath Yadav, Saurabh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Sunil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench