Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10444/2025 of ISLAMUDDIN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 8 OTHERS on 17 October 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10444 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer(s):- "(i) Issue of a writ order or directions in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 10444 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer(s):- "(i) Issue of a writ order or directions in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no. 2 to 9 for granting license for running Animal Market (for sheep and goat) on his land bearing gata NO.103, 116 and 118 situated at Village Paroma, Pargana - Paschim Rath, Tehsil Bikapur, Distt. - Ayodhya.
(ii) Issue of a writ order or directions in nature of Oath Commissioner Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no. 2 to to decide the pending representation of the petitioner as Dath Com contained in annexure not to this writ petition"
2. Heard Shri Vikas Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rajiv Narayan Pandey, who has appeared on behalf of the respondent/Zila Panchayat, Ayodhya.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has applied for grant of licence for running farmhouse for sheep and goat on his land, but the said application has not been decided till date.
4. Shri Rajiv Narayan Pandey, learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam on the basis of Annexure No. 5 to the petition says that the police has submitted an adverse report, as a result whereof the licence cannot be granted. However, he admits that the application of the petition has not been decided.. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikas Pandey, Dineshja Pati Tripathi L Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajeev Narayan Pandey Islamuddin .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Learned Standing Counsel has informed this Court that the perusal of Annexure No. 5 would show that it is some report(s) submitted on the basis of complaint made under IGRS.
6. We dispose of the petition with a direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Bikapur, District Ayodhya to submit a proper report to the Zila Panchyat, Ayodhya within fifteen days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The Zila Panchayat, Ayodhya shall decide the application of the petitioner within fifteen days thereafter.
October 17, 2025 Raj WRIC No. 10444 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench