Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10450/2025 of BAIJRANI PANDEY Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 17 October 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10450 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer(s):- "I. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to immediately restore the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 10450 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer(s):- "I. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to immediately restore the water supply connection to the petitioner's house no. 107 at enclave of Manas City Vistar, Chandan, police station Indira Nagar, district Lucknow Indra Nagar Lucknow in the interest of justice.
II. Issue a direction restraining the Opposite Party no. 4 from demanding or recovering any alleged "dues" unless duly assessed, verified, and communicated to the petitioner as per law in the interest of justice."
2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Shri Sankalp Dewari, learned counsel, who has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 3.
3. It appears from the perusal of the pleadings on record that the petitioner is aggrieved against the action of the respondent no. 4/Eden Projects Private, Sector 17/24 Indira Nagar, Lucknow, the Developer of Manas City Vistar.
4. The writ petition praying for mandamus to be issued to the private respondent is ordinarily not entertained. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Verender Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sankalp Dewari Baijrani Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the District Magistrate, Lucknow against any grievance raised against the developer within a period of one week from today. If such an application is made, the same shall be decided after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned within a further period of four weeks thereafter. October 17, 2025 Raj WRIC No. 10450 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench