Allahabad High Court
WRIC/10317/2025 of NEENA KHURANA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING AND 3 OTHERS on 17 October 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10317 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Abhishek Khare, learned counsel for respondent no.4. This writ
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10317 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Abhishek Khare, learned counsel for respondent no.4. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief :- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent no. 2 to execute the Recovery Certificate dated 01.09.2025 issued by the Secretary, Learned Authority contained as Annexure-1 to the instant Writ Petition within such reasonable time frame as this Hon'ble Court deem just and proper. Learned counsel for respondent no. 4 states that he has no instructions regarding L.D.A. filing any appeal against the order of U.P. R.E.R.A. If that be so, let the order of U.P. R.E.R.A. be complied with, and the recovery certificate already issued on 01.09.2025 by the Secretary, U.P. R.E.R.A., be executed by the District Magistrate, Lucknow, within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. The writ petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Ashish Dewal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suyash Gupta, Abhishek Kumar, Atishay Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Abhishek Khare, Shobhit Mohan Shukla (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Neena Khurana .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench