Allahabad High Court
WRIA/12205/2025 of MEVA LAL Vs STATE PUBLIC SERVICE TRIBUNAL LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 15 October 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12205 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 12205 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(i) Issue of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 3.7.2025 passed by the opp. party no.1 i.e. State Public service Tribunal, Lucknow as contained in annexure no.1 to the writ petition.
(ii) Issue of a writ in nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 14.02.2025, passed by the District Magistrate District Dy Director Consolidation Bijnore and the order dated 16.12.2023 passed by the Settlement Officer Consolidation Bijnore and punishment order dated 6- 11-2004 passed by the Settlement Officer Consolidation Bijnore as contained in annexure no.2 to 4 to this writ petition.
(iii) Issue a writ order or directions in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opp. parties to pay the full penssionary benefits with all consequential benefits of service to the petitioner as early as possible."
3. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent no.1 has wrongly rejected the claim petition of the petitioner on the ground of limitation.
4. We have gone through the order dated 03.07.2025 challenged in this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.Mohd Kazim, Pramod Kumar, Syed Jamal Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Meva Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Public Service Tribunal Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
writ petition and have made a certain queries to the counsel for the petitioners. In reply to the same he has stated that the Original Punishment Order against which he is aggrieved dated 06.11.2004 by which two increments was stopped cumulatively, which is a major penalty. The petitioner has filed a review application on 28.06.2006, which was rejected on 16.12.2023. The petitioner, thereafter, filed an appeal on 07.08.2024 against the Punishment Order as well as the review application, which appeal was rejected on grounds of limitation on 14.02.2025. He has filed a claim petition on 23.05.2025 which has also been rejected on grounds of limitation by the respondent no.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not show any provision in the Rules which permitted him to file an appeal after his review application was rejected on 16.12.2023. Nevertheless, he filed the appeal in August, 2024, which was rejected on 14.02.2025. The claim petition filed thereafter on 23.05.2025.
5. We find no good ground to show interference in the order impugned.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. October 15, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIA No. 12205 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench