Allahabad High Court
/10051/2025 of NAVEEN KUMAR MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 14 October 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10051 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of the State-respondents and Shri Suyash Dwivedi, learned counsel
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10051 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of the State-respondents and Shri Suyash Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayers : "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.4 to release the entire dues amount of the petitioner i.e. Rs.15,95,176/- (Rupees Fifteen Lacs Ninety Five Thousand one hundred seventy six only) in favour of the petitioner, in the interest of justice." It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has admittedly performed the work assigned to him relating to the Community Health Centre, Jahangeerganj. The said fact has also been admitted by the respondents, however, the petitioner's dues have not been paid to him. Against the total payable amount of Rs.7,87,602/-, the respondents have paid only Rs.1,92,000/- to the petitioner. In this regard, the petitioner has made a representation dated 22.09.2025 to the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Jahangeerganj, District Ambedkar Nagar, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure No.5 to the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that a direction may be issued to the respondents to decide the said representation. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Suyash Dwivedi Naveen Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Jahangeerganj, District Ambedkar Nagar, to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.09.2025 within a period of two weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. It is clarified that this Court has not entered into the merits of the claim of the petitioner. October 14, 2025 Mahesh WRIC No. 10051 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench