Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/1034/2023 of SUNNAMPALLI THULASAMMA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 15 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] FRIDAY, THE 16th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1034/2023 Between: 1. SUNNAMPALLI THULASAMMA, W/O VENKATA RANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52
APHC010062122023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 16th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. SUNNAMPALLI THULASAMMA, W/O VENKATA RANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 6-14, BUDILIVANDLA PALLI
VILLAGE, GORANTLA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
2. G. SUMALATHA @ CHITTAMMA,, D/O SUNNAMPALLI VENKATA
RANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 6-14, BUDILIVANDLA PALLI VILLAGE, GORANTLA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR
DISTRICT.
3. MALLELA SURENDRA REDDY,, S/O LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 6-20, KAMBALAPALLI VILLAGE, CHILAMATTURU MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE SUB- DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM, REP BY THE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AMARAVATHI.
2. S S P SIVA JYOTHI, , W/O S. BALA CHANDRA REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 6-664-A, SHANTHI NAGAR, DHARMAVARAM TOWN, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the proceedings in S.C. No.
Page 1 of 3
SUN,J
CRLP.No.1034 of 2023
43/2021 on the file of the SC/SC Sessions Judge Court, Ananthapuram and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in S.C. No. 43/2021
on the file of the SC/SC Sessions Judge Court, Ananthapuramu, Pending disposal of the Criminal petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. RAVI CHANDAVARAPU
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
SUN,J
Page 2 of 3
ORDER:
1. No representation on behalf of the petitioners. On the last adjournment i.e., on 04.05.2026, also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the petition.
2. In the result, this Criminal Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J
Date: 16.10.2026 DS / SSA
SUN,J
Date: 16.10.2026 DS / SSA
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…