Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/9023/2026 of Anu Majhi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 15 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 16th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9023/2026 Between: 1. ANU MAJHI, S/O. GURUSHA MAJHI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,R/O. PILLIPAJU VILLAGE, ANTARABA
APHC010539322026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 16th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9023/2026
Between:
1. ANU MAJHI, S/O. GURUSHA MAJHI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,R/O.
PILLIPAJU
VILLAGE,
ANTARABA
PANCHAYAT,
MOHAN
BLOCK,GAJAPATHI DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE.
2. ABHI MAJHI, S/O. MAHASHA MAJHI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,R/O.
PILLIPAJU
VILLAGE,
ANTARABA
PANCHAYAT,
MOHAN
BLOCK,GAJAPATHI DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE.
3. SAUL MAJHI, ,M/O. TRUCHI MAJHI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,R/O.
PILLIPAJU
VILLAGE,
ANTARABA
PANCHAYAT,
MOHAN
BLOCKGAJAPATHI DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1. THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
Rep
by
its
Public
Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. BALABHADRUNI MANOHAR
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Page 1 of 3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 439(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity „the Cr.P.C.,‟)/Section 483(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity „the BNSS‟), seeking to modify the condition imposed on the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 vide order dated 13.07.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.288 of 2026 in Crime No.29 of 2026 of Battili Police Station, passed by the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Srikakulam (for brevity „the learned Trial Court‟).
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the financial condition of the Petitioners is deplorable and they are unable to comply with the conditions imposed by the learned Trial Court.
3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.
4. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 13.07.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.288 of 2026 in Crime No.29 of 2026 of Battili Police Station, passed by the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Srikakulam, against the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 is hereby modified as under: “The Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 shall be enlarged on bail on their executing personal bond for a Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Page 2 of 3
Thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Kothuru.”
5. The residual conditions imposed by „the learned Trial Court‟ in the original order shall remain in force and shall be duly complied with by the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 16.10.2026 VMM
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9023 of 2026
Date: 16.10.2026
VMM
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…