Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/8981/2026 of Jangam Harikrishna Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE 15^'^ DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8981 OF 2026 Between: Jangam Harikrishna, S/o. late J.Ramachandraiah, aged 56 years, R/o. D.No. 14-99, Krishna Reddy Colony, Auto Nagar, Renigunta

APHC010536662026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

THURSDAY, THE 15^'^ DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8981 OF 2026

Between:

Jangam Harikrishna, S/o. late J.Ramachandraiah, aged 56 years, R/o. D.No.

14-99, Krishna Reddy Colony, Auto Nagar, Renigunta Road, Tirupati Town, Tirupati District.

...Petitioner/Accused No.3

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by

its Public Prosecutor, High Court of

Andhra Pradesh, At Amaravati.

...Respondent

Petition

under

Section

&

of BNSS,

praying

that

in

the

circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner/Accused No. 3 on bail, pending investigation, inquiry and trial in Cr. No. 464/2026 East Police Station, Tirupati District.

The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments df Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner

and

of

Public

Prosecutor for Respondent, the Court made the following

APHC010536662026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY. THE 15*^ DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8981/2026

Between:

1.JANGAM HARIKRISHNA, S/0. LATE J. RAMACHANDRAIAH.AGED 56

YEARS,

RIO.

D.NO.

14-99,KRISHNA

REDDY

COLONY,

AUTO

NAGAR.RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI TOWN.TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3

AND

1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep by its Public Prosecutor.High Court of Andhra Pradesh,At Amaravati.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1.D PURNACHANDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.3 on bail in Crime No.464 of 2026 of East Police Station, Tirupathi District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 144(2), 111(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for

BNS’) and Sections 3(2)(a), 4(1). 5(1 )(a) of the Immoral Traffic brevity, ‘the (Prevention) Act, 1956 (for brevity, ‘the Act’), Mr. D. Purnachandra Reddy, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence. He has been falsely implicated by the police. He is a law-abiding citizen. The Petitioner undertakes to strictly adhere to any conditions that may be imposed by this

2. Court. Hence, it is urged to allow the Petition.

3. Per contra, Mr. A.Sai Rohith, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner, submitting that the investigation is still underway and several material witnesses remain to be examined. It is contended that if the Petitioner is released on bail at this stage, likelihood that he may abscond, thereby hampering the ongoing investigation and evading the process of law and urged to dismiss the Petition. there is a strong Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant

4. Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

5. As seen from the record, the Petitioner is arraigned as Accused No.3 in this case. The prosecution alleges that the Petitioner, along with the other accused, was involved in activities relating to prostitution. The Petitioner was apprehended on 08.09.2026 and has been in judicial custody for the past 37 similar adverse antecedents reported against the days. There are no

/ Petitioner. The material portion of the investigation is completed, and so far, three witnesses have been examined. The Petitioner is a permanent resident of Tirupati District. He has got fixed abode. If the Petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to stringent conditions,

6. there is no likelihood of his absconding, threatening the witnesses, tampering with the evidence or hampering the further course of investigation.

7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the Petitioner/Accused No.3, this Court is inclined to enlarge the Petitioner on bail, subject to certain stringent \ \ conditions.

8. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent conditions;

i. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 shall be enlarged on bail subject to his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati.

ii. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till filing of the charge sheet,

iii. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 shall not leave the limits of the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned, iv. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future.

f

V. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer in further investigation of the and shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required. Vi. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 shall not, directly indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court. case or

vii. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 shall surrender his passport, if any, to the Investigating Officer. If he claims that he does not have passport, he shall submit affidavit to that effect to the Investigating Officer. Sd/-SUDA SRINIVASA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati.

2. The Superintendent, Special Sub-Jail, Tirupati.

3. The Station-House Officer, East Police Station, Tirupati District.

4. One CC to Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP, Amaravati. [OUT]

6. One spare copy. PSD

HIGH COURT DR.YLR,J DATE:15/10/2026 BAIL ORDER CRLP NO. 8981 OF 2026 ALLOWED

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead