Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/8955/2026 of Raj Abhishek Raj Sinku Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 14 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE 15th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8955/2026 Between: 1. RAJ ABHISHEK RAJ SINKU, S/O. DARA SINGH SINKU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,RIO. TUNTAKATA
APHC010535292026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 15th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8955/2026
Between:
1. RAJ ABHISHEK RAJ SINKU, S/O. DARA SINGH SINKU, AGED
ABOUT 25 YEARS,RIO. TUNTAKATA VILLAGE, KUMARDUNGI
P.S.,WEST SINGBHUM DISTRICT, JHARKHAND STATE.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1
AND
1. THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
Rep
by
its
Public
Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. BALABHADRUNI MANOHAR
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 439(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity „the Cr.P.C.,‟)/Section 483(1)(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity „the BNSS‟), seeking to modify the condition imposed on the Petitioner/Accused No.1 vide order dated 03.09.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.379 of 2026 in Crime No.58 of 2026 of Itchapuram Town Police Station, passed by the learned Special Judge for Trial of offences under the NDPS Act-cum-I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Srikakulam (for brevity „the learned Trial Court‟).
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the financial condition of the Petitioner is deplorable and he is unable to comply with the conditions imposed by the learned Trial Court.
3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.
4. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 03.09.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.379 of 2026 in Crime No.58 of 2026 of Itchapuram Town Police Station, passed by the learned Special Judge for Trial of offences under the NDPS Act-cum-I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Srikakulam, against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 is hereby modified as under: “The Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall be enlarged on bail on his executing personal bond for a Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sompeta (FAC), Ichapuram.”
5. The residual conditions imposed by „the learned Trial Court‟ in the original order shall remain in force and shall be duly complied with by the Petitioner/Accused No.1.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 15.10.2026 PRA
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8955 of 2026
Date: 15.10.2026
PRA