Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/959/2019 of SRIRAM KAZA Vs KAZA SRILAKSHMI on 13 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 959/2019 and 619/2024 1. CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.959/2019 Between: SRIRAM KAZA,
APHC010280632019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 959/2019 and 619/2024
1. CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.959/2019
Between:
SRIRAM KAZA, S/O. PURUSHOTHAM LATE,. HINDU, AGED 42
YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O. 22, PLOT NO 420/22, II A MAIN, KASTHURI
NAGAR, BANGALORE 560043
...PETITIONER
AND
1. KAZA SRILAKSHMI, D/O D JANAKI RAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 41
YEARS, EMPLOYEE, D.NO 20-6/6-141C, MAIN ROAD, AYODHYA
NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA
2. KAZA SRIVATHSAV, S/O. SRIRAM, HINDU, AGED 17 YEARS, STUDENT, D.NO 20-6/6-141C, MAIN ROAD, AYODHYA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT
AMARAVATHI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D BUTCHI BABU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. PHANI VISWANATH CHALLA
2. CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.619 of 2024
Between:
SRIRAM KAZA, S/O. PURUSHOTHAM( LATE), HINDU, AGED 47
YEARS,
EMPLOYEE,
OPP.RYTHU
BAZAAR,
YERRAGADDA,
SANJEEVAREDDYNAGAR,HYDERABAD
...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP.,
BY
ITS
PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATHI.
2. KAZASRILAKSHMI, D/O. D. JANAKI RAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 46
YEARS.
EMPLOYEE,
D.NO.20-6/6-
C,
MAIN
ROAD,
AYODHYANAGAR, VIJ AYAWADA.
3. KAZA SRIVATHSAVA, S/O. SRIRAM, HINDU, AGED 22 YEARS.
STUDENT, D.NO.20-6/6- 141 C, MAIN ROAD, AYODHYA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D BUTCHI BABU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2. PHANI VISWANATH CHALLA
Page 1 of 2
The Court made the following:
COMMON ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
2. The petitioner and the respondents in Crl.R.C.No.959 of 2019 and Crl.R.C.No.619 of 2024, are one and the same.
3. Counsel for both sides in the Criminal Revision Cases mentioned supra submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled out of Court and that no further cause survives for adjudication in the present Criminal Revision Case.
4. Petitioner and respondents are present and submitted that they have entered into a compromise.
5. In view of the above submission, and considering the fact that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, the Crl.R.C.No.959 of 2019 and Crl.R.C.No.619 of 2024, are disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 14.10.2026 DRNR
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 959 of 2019 and 619 of 2024 Dated: 14.10.2026
DRNR
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…