Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2135/2026 of BALANAGAMMA Vs Sri Dr. A. Siri I.A.S., on 13 October 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2135/2026 Between: 1. BALANAGAMMA, BALANAGAMMA, D/O. LATE K. ERANNA, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC ANGANWADI WORKER,

APHC010306852026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2135/2026

Between:

1. BALANAGAMMA, BALANAGAMMA, D/O. LATE K. ERANNA, AGED

46 YEARS, OCC ANGANWADI WORKER, R/O.DR.NO.3/221, KOSIGI VILLAGE AND MARIDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SRI DR A SIRI I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

2. SRI VIJAYA, PROJECT DIRECTOR,J J DW AND CDA, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

3. SRI RAJESWARI, CHILD DEVELOPMENT. PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS PROJECT, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for the willful deliberate and wanton violation of the orders Dt.19.10.2024 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP.No. 27748/2014

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V S K RAMA RAO

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. U KANAKA RAJU

The Court made the following:

Page 1 of 2

CONTEMPT CASE No.2135 OF 2026

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that, in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court on 19.10.2024 in W.P.No.27748 of 2014, the respondent authorities have issued a notice to the petitioner by registered post, which was returned with an endorsement that “party refused”.

2. In view of the above, the learned counsel submits that the respondent authorities have complied with the orders of this Court and that no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.

3. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, nothing further survives for consideration in this Contempt Case.

4. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

5. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 14.10.2026 KGM

CONTEMPT CASE No.2135 of 2026 Date: 14.10.2026

KGM

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead