Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1098/2026 of Chitikina Nageswara Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 12 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 13th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1098/2026 Between: 1. CHITIKINA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. VENKATANARAYANA, MALE, AGED 43 YEARS.
APHC010496672026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 13th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1098/2026
Between:
1. CHITIKINA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. VENKATANARAYANA, MALE, AGED
YEARS.
BUSINESS,R/O
D.NO.3-149,
SUBBANNA
CHERUVU STREET, MORTHA VILLAGE UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534227
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI-
522239.
2. KANAKAM RAJU, S/O. SRINIVASA RAO, MALE, AGED 31 YEARS.
BUSINESS,R/O D.NO.4-120, PERAVALI VILLAGE MANDAL,EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534328
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MALLAVELLI NAGA SAI LALITH KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. D.RAMASWAMY REDDY
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 438 read with 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’), challenging the impugned order dated 07.08.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.134 of 2026 in Crl.M.P.No.105 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.86 of 2026 in C.C.No.393 of 2025, whereby and whereunder the application was dismissed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the learned Legal Aid Counsel for Respondent No.2 and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.
3. Several opportunities were given to the Petitioner to deposit 20% of the cheque amount, as directed by the learned Trial Court. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the financial condition of the Petitioner was so deplorable that he could not deposit the amount. However, he has now secured the finances and is ready to deposit 20% of the cheque amount before the learned Trial Court, if some time is granted. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed, directing the Petitioner to deposit 20% of the cheque amount before the learned Trial Court on or before 27.10.2026.
4. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 13.10.2026 KMS
HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
Crl.R.C.No.1098 of 2026 Dated: 13.10.2026
KMS