Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/26318/2023 of G CHENNAIAH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 12 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 13th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 26318 OF 2023 Between: 1. G CHENNAIAH, S/o.G.Ravi Kumar, Aged 40 Years, R/o.D.No.86-112, Housing Board
APHC010508702023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 13th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26318 OF 2023
Between:
1. G CHENNAIAH, S/o.G.Ravi Kumar, Aged 40 Years, R/o.D.No.86-112, Housing Board Colony, Kurnool, Kurnool District-518002.
...Petitioner
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. The A P Residential Educational Institutions Society, Rep. by its Secretary, IllandIV Floors, Pamulapati Sivaiah Complex, Naidupeta, Koritapadu Road, Guntur District-522 007.
3. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool.
4. The Principal, A.P Residential School for Minority Girls, Panchalingala(V), Kurnool(M), Kurnool District.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned action of the respondents in terminating petitioner orally on 13.10.2022, without any notice
or opportunity, inspite of petitioner service for long 14 years i.e. from 2008 to 2022, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, apart from contrary to the Government Memo No. GAD01- SUOMISC/31/2019-SU-1, dated 20.11.2019, consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with all attendant benefits, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to service by considering representation dt 18.09.2023, Pending disposal of the present Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to file Counter Affidavit in WP.No.26318 of 2023
before this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to condone delay of 327 days in representing the returned lA.SR.No.36468 of 2024 on the file of this Hon’ble Court and to pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Vacate the Interim Order dated 07.10.2023 in I.A. No.l of 2023 in W.P. No. 26318 of 2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: G V SHIVAJI
Counsel for the Respondents: VINOD KUMAR TARLADA SC For APREIS,BCW,SCW,TBW EIS,RAYALASEEMA,PRK,NLR, Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR SERVICES III Counsel for the Respondents:GP
FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following order:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26318 OF 2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition has already been redressed by the respondents. Hence, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and no further orders are necessary.
Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
13.10.2026 TPS/BSP
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26318 OF 2023
13.10.2026 TPS/BSP