Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2972/2025 of VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO Vs SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS on 12 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 13th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2972 OF 2025 Between: 1. VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO, S/o. Krishna Rao, Aged about 47 years, Occ- Contractor,
APHC010547682025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 13th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2972 OF 2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO, S/o. Krishna Rao, Aged about 47 years, Occ- Contractor, R/o. 36-85, Purushothama patnam, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND
1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, Principal Secretary of Finance Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District. (R-2)
2. Sri P Srihari Babu, Commissioner, Chilakaluripet Municipality Chilakaluripet, Palnadu District. (R-4)
3. Sri Shaik Abdul Rahim, Deputy Executive Engineer, Chilakaluripet Municipality Chilakaluripet, Palnadu District. (R-5) ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Honble High court for deliberate. intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 21.08.2025 passed in WP No. 15884 of 2024 under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner: MODAPOTHULA SU MALATHA Counsel for the Respondents: RAMA RAO KOCHIRI Counsel for the Respondents:SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI
The Court made the following order:
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
13.10.2026 BAK/APSK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE No.2972 Of 2025.
13.10.2026 BAK/APSK