Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP(AT)/454/2022 of P NAGA DURGA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 12 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the thirteenth day of October, Two thousand and twenty Six The Honourable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition (Transferred Between: P. Naga Durga, W/o. Shekar, Age: 33 years, Occ: Office subordinate, O/o. The Sub
APHC010567662022
IN THE H
(
Tuesday, the thirteenth
The Honour
Writ Petition (Tr
Between:
P. Naga Durga, W/o. S
O/o. The Sub Registrar
district.
and
1.
The State of A
Secretary, Reve
Velagapudi.
2.
The Director and I
Edupugallu, Krishn
3.
The Deputy Inspe
4.
The District Regis
Counsel for the petitio
1.Amara Rama Rao
Counsel for the respon
1.G.P. for Services -
The Court made the fo
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
h day of October, Two thousand and twe
Present
rable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi
ransferred from APAT) No.454 of 2022
(O.A. No. 199 of 2019)
hekar, Age: 33 years, Occ: Office subo
r of Asurances, Chinthalapudi, West G
….P
Andhra Pradesh, through its Specia
nue (Regn-I) Department, Secretariat B
Inspector General, Registration & Stamp
na District.
ctor General, Registration & Stamps, Elu trar, Eluru.
….Resp
ner:
ndents:
I
llowing:
enty Six ordinate,
Godavari
etitioner
al Chief
uildings,
ps, A.P.,
uru.
ondents
BSB, J
W.P (AT) No. 454 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed with a prayer to set aside the Proceedings No. E1 / 343 / 2017- 6, dated 02.02.2019, of the respondent No.4 reverting the applicant as Office Subordinate as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
2. The learned Government Pleader for Services-I placed on record a copy of the written instructions of the District Registrar, vide Letter No. WP (AT) No.454/2022, dated 09.07.2026, wherein it was mentioned that the petitioner was promoted as Junior Assistant and therefore, the grievance of the petitioner was resolved. A copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner to the District Registrar is enclosed to the written instructions, wherein it was stated that the petitioner got promoted and therefore, she is not interested in further prosecuting the writ petition.
3. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner submitted that there are no instructions from the petitioner despite the effort made to contact her over phone.
4. Since the writ petitioner is represented by the counsel, yet, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition, as it seems, and in view of the written instructions noted above, no further order is required.
5. As such, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to work out remedy, as per law, if still aggrieved.
BSB, J W.P (AT) No. 454 of 2022
There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ B.S. BHANUMATHI, J Dt.13-10-2026 RAR