Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/3056/2016 of Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd Vs Ponna Krishna Reddy on 11 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] MONDAY, THE 12th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3056/2016 Between: 1. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD, REP BY ITS BRANCH
APHC010580682016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 12th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD, REP BY ITS
BRANCH MANAGER, M.R.B. TRADE CENTRE, 3RD FLOOR, BANGARUPETA, KURNOOL DISTRICT-5058004.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. PONNA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. P. PEDDA PULLA REDDY, HINDU, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. KANDLA GUDURU VILLAGE, PEDDA
VADUGURU MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT
2. G VENKATA REDDY, S/O. G. KONDA REDDY, HINDU, AGED:
MAJOR, R/O. VENGANNAPALLI VILLAGE, PUPPALA POST, YADIKI
MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
3. GOOTY VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O. G. SUBBA REDDY, R/O.
VENGANNAPALLI VILLAGE, PUPPALA POST, YADIKI MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Courtto allow the appeal by setting aside the Orders dated 24.08.2016 made in O.P.No. 62 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal- cum- VI
Additional District Judge, Anantapuram at Gooty and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Judgment and Decree dated 24.08.2016 made in OP.NO. 62 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal- cum- VI Additional District Judge, Anantapur at Gooty, and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders passed in MACMAMP No.5422/2016 in MACMA
No.3056/2016 dated 25.11.2016 and permit the petitioner to withdraw the amount deposited by the appellant Counsel for the Appellant:
1. CHEKURI SRIPATI RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. INENI VENKATA PRASAD
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
1. Learned counsel for the Respondent/Claimant is present.
2. No representation on behalf of the appellant. On the last three adjournments i.e., on 14.03.2024, 11.09.2026 and 28.09.2026 also there was no representation. It shows that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the appeal.
3. In the result, this Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J Date: 12.10.2026 CJP
Date: 12.10.2026 CJP