Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2891/2026 of ARJA SUDHAKARA RAO Vs THOTA JAHNAVI on 11 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 12 PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2891/2026 Between: 1. ARJA SUDHAKARA YEARS, R/O, H-NO 138,1ST WARD BHAVADEVARAPALLI VILLAGE, NAGAYALANKA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. THOTA JAHNAVI, Panchayat
APHC010398672026
IN THE
MONDAY, T
PRESENT:THE HONOU
CONT
Between:
1. ARJA SUDHAKARA
YEARS, R/O, H-NO 1
NAGAYALANKA MAN
1. THOTA JAHNAVI, P
Panchayat, Nagayala
Petition under Section
that in the circumstances s
be pleased to punish th
Contempt of Court Act, 19
orders of this Hon'ble Court
Counsel for the Petitioner
1.VARDHINEEDI SAI K
Counsel for the Contemno
1.Y KOTESWARA RAO
The Court made the follow
CC
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THE 12th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
URABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMA
TEMPT CASE NO: 2891/2026
RAO, S/O RAMA MOHANA RAO,
138,1ST WARD BHAVADEVARAPALLI
NDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PE
AND
Panchayat Secretary, Bhavadevarapa
nka Mandal, Krishna District.
...CON
ns 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 19
tated in the affidavit file herein the High he respondents under sections 10 to 71 for willful violation, flouting and diso t dt.10-12-2025 passed in W.P.No.17734
r:
IRAN
or:
wing:
RC,J
No.2891 of 2026
H
ALAPATI
AGED 63
VILLAGE,
TITIONER
alli Grama
NTEMNOR
971 praying
Court may
12 of the
obeying the
4 of 2023,
RC,J
CC No.2891 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri Vardhineedi Saikiran, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and this Contempt Case may be closed.
2. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 12th October, 2026
RR