Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/2437/2026 of Nese Savitramma Vs A Munemma on 9 October 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] SATURDAY, THE 10 th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2437/2026 Between: 1. NESE SAVITRAMMA, , W/O. NESE RAMAMUTTHY,AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,

APHC010462992026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2437/2026

Between:

1. NESE SAVITRAMMA, , W/O. NESE RAMAMUTTHY,AGED ABOUT 56

YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE,R/O. VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE OF

YEMMIGANURTOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

2. NESE CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O. NESE RAMAMURTHY,AGED ABOUT

44 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,R/O. VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE OF

YEMMIGANURTOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

3. PG SWATHI, , W/O. CHANDRA SEKHAR,AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC

HOUSEWIFE,R/O. VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE OF YEMMIGANURTOWN

AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. A MUNEMMA, W/O. LATE RANGA MUNI,AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE,R/O. OBULAWARIPALLI VILLAGE, PEAPULLY

MANDAL,KURNOOL DISTRICT

2. A RAMA CHANDRUDU, S/O. LATE RANGA MUNIAGED ABOUT 56

YEARS,

OCC

NOT

KNOWN

TO

THE

PETITIONER,R/O.

OBULAWARIPALLI

VILLAGE,

PEAPULLY

MANDAL,KURNOOL

DISTRICT

3. A YELLAIAH, S/O. LATE RANGA MUNI,AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC

NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,R/O. OBULAWARIPALLI VILLAGE, PEAPULLY MANDAL,KURNOOL DISTRICT

4. A KRISHNAIAH, , S/O. LATE RANGA MUNIAGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,R/O. OBULAWARIPALLI

VILLAGE, PEAPULLY MANDAL,KURNOOL DISTRICT

5. A RANGASWAMY, S/O. LATE RANGA MUNIAGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,R/O. OBULAWARIPALLI

VILLAGE, PEAPULLY MANDAL,KURNOOL DISTRICT

6. A SHANKAR BABU, S/O. LATE RANGA MUNI,AGED ABOUT 27

YEARS,

OCC

NOT

KNOWN

TO

THE

PETITIONER,R/O.

OBULAWARIPALLI

VILLAGE,

PEAPULLY

MANDAL,KURNOOL

DISTRICT

7. A LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O. NEELAKANTAIAH,D/O. LATE RANGA MUNI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. OBULAWARIPALLI

VILLAGE,PEAPULLY MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

8. A DHANAMMA ALIAS LAKSHMI, , W/O. KONDAIAH,D/O. LATE RANGA

MUNI,

AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,OCC

HOUSEWIFE,

R/O.

OBULAWARIPALLI

VILLAGE,PEAPULLY

MANDAL,

KURNOOL

DISTRICT

9. A SALAMMA ALIAS SARASWATHI, W/O RAMU,D/O. LATE RANGA

MUNI,

AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,OCC

HOUSEWIFE,

R/O.

OBULAWARIPALLI

VILLAGE,PEAPULLY

MANDAL,

KURNOOL

DISTRICT

10. A RAMESWARI ALIAS SUSMA, , W/O. NAGARAJD/O. LATE RANGA

MUNI

AGED

ABOUT

Page 1 of 4

YEARS,OCC

HOUSEWIFE,

R/O.

OBULAWARIPALLI

VILLAGEPEAPULLY

MANDAL,

KURNOOL

DISTRICT

11. NESE MADANNA, S/O. NESE TIPPANNA,AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,R/O. VENKATAPURAM

VILLAGE

OF

YEMMIGANURTOWN

AND

MANDAL,

KURNOOL

DISTRICT

12. NESE RAMA MURTHY, S/O. NESE TIPPANNA,AGED ABOUT 60

YEARS,

OCC

NOT

KNOWN

TO

THE

PETITIONERR/O.

VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE OF YEMMIGANURTOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. K RAMA KOTESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. K V RAGHU VEER

2. MARELLA RADHA

Page 2 of 4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2437 of 2026

ORDER :

Questioning the docket order dated 27.08.2026 passed in CFR No.1858 of 2026 in E.A.No. of 2026 in E.P.No.33 of 2024 in O.S.No.43 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Yemmiganuru, the proposed implead petitioners filed the present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondents 1 to 10 filed O.S. No. 43 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Yemmiganuru, seeking recovery of possession of suit scheduled property from respondents 11 and 12. The said suit was decreed by judgment and decree dated 30.01.2024. The said judgment and decree have attained finality, and no appeal has been preferred against the same. Thereafter, respondents 1 to 10 filed E.P. No. 33 of 2024 in O.S. No. 43 of 2015, seeking execution of the decree. During pendency of the said E.P., as the judgment debtors were not honoring the decree, respondents 1 to 10 filed an application seeking police aid to evict the judgment debtors from the E.P. Schedule property. The said I.A. was dismissed, questioning which respondents 1 to 10 filed C.R.P. No. 1737 of 2025 before this Court. This Court allowed the said C.R.P., directing grant of police aid for the execution of the decree. Thereafter, the petitioners herein filed the present claim petition, contending that they have right over the subject property and have been running a chicken centre on the said property for the last 25 years. The said claim petition was rejected, which is impugned in the present C.R.P.

Page 3 of 4

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the entire material on record.

4. The judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 43 of 2015 has attained finality, and no appeal has been preferred against the same. Admittedly, the petitioners have no title to the E.P. scheduled property, nor have they produced even a single document to establish their title over the said property, either in the present proceedings or in the earlier round of litigation, i.e., C.R.P. No. 1737 of 2025. Respondent No. 11 has not raised any objection or put forth any claim in this regard. It appears that, having exhausted all available remedies, respondent No. 11 has set up the present petitioners with the present claim petition. In such circumstances, there are no grounds to interfere with the docket order dated 27.08.2026 passed in CFR No.1858 of 2026 in E.A.No. of 2026 in E.P.No.33 of 2024 in O.S.No.43 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Yemmiganuru.

5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________

K SURESH REDDY, J Date: 10.10.2026 Asr

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2437 of 2026

Date: 10.10.2026 ASR

Page 4 of 4

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead