Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/6256/2023 of KARNATI MLLIKARJUNA REDDY Vs Sri S.S. Rawat IAS, on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6256/2023 Between: 1. KARNATI MLLIKARJUNA REDDY, S/O. MALAKONDAREDDY, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. H. NO. 5 GUDLURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 1. SRI

APHC010583042023

IN THE H

(

SATURDAY,

THE HONOURAB

CONT

Between:

1. KARNATI MLLIKARJU

47 YEARS, R/O. H

GUDLURU MANDAL,

1. SRI S S RAWAT IAS

FINANCE

AND

GUNTUR DISTRICT

2. SRI KONA SASIDH

AND RURAL DEVE

ANDHRA PRADESH

3. SRI Y KOTESWARA

KANDUKUR, PRAKA

4. SRI K

RAJASEKH

OFFICER, GUDLUR

5. SRI

B

MARTIN

PANCHAYAT SECR

GUDLUR MANDAL,

6. SRI U SEETHARAM

PANCHAYAT, GUDL

C.C.N

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA

TEMPT CASE NO: 6256/2023

UNA REDDY, S/O. MALAKONDAREDD

. NO. 5-37, CHENCHIREDDYPALEM

PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

...PE

AND

S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPART

PLANNING,

SECRETARIAT,

VELA

.

HAR IAS, COMMISSIONER, PANCHA

ELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERN

H, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTR

A RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI

ASAM DISTRICT.

HAR, MANDAL PARISHAD DEVEL

, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

LUTHER,

EXECUTIVE

AUTHORITY

RETARY, GUNDLAPALEM GRAM PAN

PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

MAMMA, SARPANCH, GUNDLAPALE

LUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

RC,J

No.6256 of 2023

ATI

DY, AGED

VILLAGE,

TITIONER

TMENT OF

AGAPUDI,

AYAT RAJ

MENT OF

RICT.

DIVISION,

LOPMENT

Y-

CUM-

NCHAYAT,

EM GRAM

RC,J

C.C.No.6256 of 2023

7. SRI

B

MARTIN

LUTHER,

EXECUTIVE

AUTHORITY-

CUM-

PANCHAYAT

SECRETARY,

BASIREDDYPALEM

GRAM

PANCHAYAT, GUDLUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

8. SRI Y DAVID RAJU, SARPANCH, BASIREDDYPALEM GRAM

PANCHAYAT, GUDLUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

9. SRI

P

SUMANA,

EXECUTIVE

ENGINEER,PRI

DIVISION,

KANDUKUR(PRESENTLY KAVALI), PRAKASAM DISTRICT

10. SRI Y VENKATESWARLU, MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT

OFFICER, GUDLUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT

11. SMT

CH

LAKSHMI

LATHA,

EXECUTIVE

AUTHORITY-CUM-

PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GUNDLAPALEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, GUDLUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

12. SRI K SRINIVAS, EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY-CUM-PANCHAYAT

SECRETARY, BASIREDDYPALEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, GUDLUR

MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. RR 9 TO 12 ARE IMPLEADED AS

PER COURT ORDER DATED 05.12.2025, VIDE IA NO-1/2025 IN

CC NO-6256 OF 2023

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10

to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Honourable Court dated 29.08.2023 passed in W.P. No. 21338 of 2023

and to pass such

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased t dispense with the filing of Copy of Order dates 29.08.2023

passed in W.P. No. 21338 of 2023 by the Honourable High Court and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead the proposed respondents RC,J

C.C.No.6256 of 2023

as respondents 9 to 12 to the present Contempt Case No. 6256 of 2023 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.RAMESH BABU TALLURI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1.VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM

PANCHAYAT

2.RAMA RAO KOCHIRI

3.KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI

4.C SUMON

5.G VENKATA REDDY

6.Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Sri K.P.K.Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri Ramesh Babu Talluri, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and this Contempt Case may be closed.

2. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 10th October, 2026

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead