Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/6256/2023 of KARNATI MLLIKARJUNA REDDY Vs Sri S.S. Rawat IAS, on 9 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6256/2023 Between: 1. KARNATI MLLIKARJUNA REDDY, S/O. MALAKONDAREDDY, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. H. NO. 5 GUDLURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 1. SRI
APHC010583042023
IN THE H
(
SATURDAY,
THE HONOURAB
CONT
Between:
1. KARNATI MLLIKARJU
47 YEARS, R/O. H
GUDLURU MANDAL,
1. SRI S S RAWAT IAS
FINANCE
AND
GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. SRI KONA SASIDH
AND RURAL DEVE
ANDHRA PRADESH
3. SRI Y KOTESWARA
KANDUKUR, PRAKA
4. SRI K
RAJASEKH
OFFICER, GUDLUR
5. SRI
B
MARTIN
PANCHAYAT SECR
GUDLUR MANDAL,
6. SRI U SEETHARAM
PANCHAYAT, GUDL
C.C.N
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA
TEMPT CASE NO: 6256/2023
UNA REDDY, S/O. MALAKONDAREDD
. NO. 5-37, CHENCHIREDDYPALEM
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PE
AND
S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPART
PLANNING,
SECRETARIAT,
VELA
.
HAR IAS, COMMISSIONER, PANCHA
ELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERN
H, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTR
A RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI
ASAM DISTRICT.
HAR, MANDAL PARISHAD DEVEL
, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
LUTHER,
EXECUTIVE
AUTHORITY
RETARY, GUNDLAPALEM GRAM PAN
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
MAMMA, SARPANCH, GUNDLAPALE
LUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
RC,J
No.6256 of 2023
ATI
DY, AGED
VILLAGE,
TITIONER
TMENT OF
AGAPUDI,
AYAT RAJ
MENT OF
RICT.
DIVISION,
LOPMENT
Y-
CUM-
NCHAYAT,
EM GRAM
RC,J
C.C.No.6256 of 2023
7. SRI
B
MARTIN
LUTHER,
EXECUTIVE
AUTHORITY-
CUM-
PANCHAYAT
SECRETARY,
BASIREDDYPALEM
GRAM
PANCHAYAT, GUDLUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
8. SRI Y DAVID RAJU, SARPANCH, BASIREDDYPALEM GRAM
PANCHAYAT, GUDLUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
9. SRI
P
SUMANA,
EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER,PRI
DIVISION,
KANDUKUR(PRESENTLY KAVALI), PRAKASAM DISTRICT
10. SRI Y VENKATESWARLU, MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT
OFFICER, GUDLUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
11. SMT
CH
LAKSHMI
LATHA,
EXECUTIVE
AUTHORITY-CUM-
PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GUNDLAPALEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, GUDLUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
12. SRI K SRINIVAS, EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY-CUM-PANCHAYAT
SECRETARY, BASIREDDYPALEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, GUDLUR
MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. RR 9 TO 12 ARE IMPLEADED AS
PER COURT ORDER DATED 05.12.2025, VIDE IA NO-1/2025 IN
CC NO-6256 OF 2023
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10
to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Honourable Court dated 29.08.2023 passed in W.P. No. 21338 of 2023
and to pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased t dispense with the filing of Copy of Order dates 29.08.2023
passed in W.P. No. 21338 of 2023 by the Honourable High Court and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead the proposed respondents RC,J
C.C.No.6256 of 2023
as respondents 9 to 12 to the present Contempt Case No. 6256 of 2023 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.RAMESH BABU TALLURI
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM
PANCHAYAT
2.RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
3.KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
4.C SUMON
5.G VENKATA REDDY
6.Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri K.P.K.Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri Ramesh Babu Talluri, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and this Contempt Case may be closed.
2. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 10th October, 2026
RR