Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16001/2023 of M N RAJANISH REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 9 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 16001 OF 2023 Between: 1. M N RAJANISH REDDY, S/O.SALMAN REDDY, AGED 39 YEARS, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRADE II,
APHC010311362023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. M N RAJANISH REDDY, S/O.SALMAN REDDY, AGED 39 YEARS, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRADE II, (UNDER SUSPENSION)
NOOLIVEEDU CLUSTER GRAM PANCHAYAT OF GALLIVEEDU
MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
PANCHAYAT
RAJ
AND
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE
COMMISSIONER
OF
PANCHAYAT
RAJ
AND
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT ICON, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Order more in the nature of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in placing and continuing the petitioner under suspension by the 2nd respondent through Proceedings No.2028226/CPRand RD/B2/2023 dated. 11.04.2023, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and accordingly set aside the orders of suspension issued by the 2nd respondent through Proceedings No.2028226/CPRand RD/B2/2023 dated.
11.04.2023, with a consequential direction to reinstate the petitioner into service and pass
BM,J
W.P.No.16001 of 2023
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to SUSPEND the suspension orders issued by the 2nd respondent through Proceedings No.2028226/CPRand RD/B2/2023 dated 11.04.2023, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K R SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES IV
The Court made the following:
BM,J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is reported by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous and that no cause survives for adjudication in the present writ petition and prays to dismiss the same.
2. Recording the above submissions, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. ______________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J
Date:10.10.2026 BAK/MMK
BM,J
10.10.2026
BAK/MMK