Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/369/2026 of K. Amaravathi, Vs Sri Sumit Kumar, I.A.S., on 9 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 369 OF 2026 Between: 1. K. AMARAVATHI,, W/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST RIO.
APHC010700612025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3209]
SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 369 OF 2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K. AMARAVATHI,, W/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST
RIO. NAKABALEPALLI VILLAGE, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI SUMIT KUMAR I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
2. SRI K SRINIVASA RAJU, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUB- COLLECTOR, KUPPAM (ERSTWHILE MADANAPALLI), CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. SRI B KOWLESH, THE TAHSILDAR,RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. SRI V N HARI PRASAD, VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, BANDARLAPALLI PANCHAYAT,
RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT,
5. SRI KISHOR, THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N YASODA KUMARI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SUSHMA YAGANTI
The Court made the following ORDER:
At the time of considering the matter Mrs. Sushma Yaganti, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that in view of the specific averments made in the counter affidavit at para No.7 that the official respondents have not disturbed or interfered with the subject land in any manner, the Contempt Case may be closed. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
NINALA JAYASURYA,J Date:10.10.2026 Ssv
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 369 OF 2026 Date:10.10.2026 Ssv