Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLA/380/2018 of Chimata Sambasiva Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 9 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 380/2018 Between: 1. CHIMATA SAMBASIVA RAO, R/O. TENNERU VILLAGE, KANIKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
APHC010031792018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. CHIMATA
SAMBASIVA
RAO,
R/O.
TENNERU
VILLAGE,
KANIKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...APELLANT
AND
1. THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP
BY
PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
2. MOGULURI BHASKARA RAO, R/O. TENNERU VILLAGE, KRISHNA
DISTRICT
...RESPODENT(S):
Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to file this Criminal Appeal against the Judgment of acquittal dated 09.11.2017 passed by the Learned XII Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada in Sessions Case No. 66 of 2016
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file appeal against the Judgment in SC No. 66
of 2015 Dt. 09.11.2017 on the file of Honble XII Additional District Judge cum VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District
Counsel for the Apellant:
1. VIRUPAKSHA DATTATREYA GOUDA
Counsel for the Respodent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. N PAVAN KUMAR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Ms. P. Naga Shireesha, learned counsel, representing Mr. Virupaksha Dattatreya Goud, learned counsel for the Appellant, submitted that they could not get any details in respect of the legal representatives of the defacto complainant who filed the instant appeal, feeling aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal dated 09.11.2017 in S.C. No. 66 of 2015 passed by the XII Additional District Judge-cum-VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, and requested to dismiss the appeal.
2. Recorded the said submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant.
3. In the result, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J
Date: 10.10.2026 CJP
Date: 10.10.2026 CJP