Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2789/2024 of VAKATI RAVINDRA REDDY Vs SRI ANAKAPALLI VENKATESWARA RAO on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 9 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT Between: 1. VAKATI RAVINDRA REDDY, S/O LATE RAMANA REDDY, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
APHC010224602024
IN THE H
(
FRIDAY, T
THE HON’BLE
THE HON’BLE DR.JU
CONTE
Between:
1. VAKATI RAVINDRA R YEARS, OCC: AGR GUDUR, GUDUR MA
1. SRI ANAKAPALLI VE ABOUT 55 YEARS GUDUR, TIRUPATI D
2. MR Y MALLIKHA MUNICIPALITY, GUD PER COURT ORDER Counsel for the Petitioner Mr.G.JAGADEESWAR Counsel for the Contemno Mr.GUDAPATI LAKSHM
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT E SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA USTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRAT EMPT CASE No: 2789 of 2024 REDDY, S/O LATE RAMANA REDDY, RICULTURE, R/O.D.No.6/43, EAST ANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PE AND ENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOW S, COMMISSIONER, GUDUR MUNI ISTRICT. ARJUNA RAO, COMMISSIONER, DURU. R 2 IS IMPLEADED AS SUO R DATED 14.08.2026 IN CC NO-2789 O ...CONTE r: or(S): MI NARAYANA
TAPA AGED 64 STREET, TITIONER WN, AGED CIPALITY, GUDURU MOTO AS OF 2024 MNOR(S):
Page 1 of 2
The Court made the following order: (Per NJS, J)
In view of the affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent, dated 30.09.2026 and the averments made therein, more particularly Para No.5, this Court is of the considered view that no further orders are necessary in the present Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
No order as to costs. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J
__________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 09.10.2026 BLV
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
C.C.No.2789 of 2024 Dt: 09.10.2026 BLV
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…