Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2162/2019 of M.PRAMEELA Vs STATE OF AP on 8 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2162/2019 Between: 1. M.PRAMEELA, THAMASPETA, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2. MELAM PRATHAP KUMAR, THAMASPETA,
APHC010104662019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2162/2019
Between:
1. M.PRAMEELA, THAMASPETA, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
2. MELAM PRATHAP KUMAR, THAMASPETA, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
3. KAKUMANI MARI, THAMASPETA, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1. STATE OF AP, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT
AMARAVTHI
2. MELAM JYOTHI, HAYYARANAGARM, BAPATLA MANDAL, GUNTUR
DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :-
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the petitioners, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.136 of 2016 on the file of the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chirala.
2. As seen from the record, the present criminal petition was filed by Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel. However, the registry due to oversight printed the name of Smt. G. Jahanavi, learned counsel, in the cause list as the counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, the matter was passed over in the morning session. At about 2:15 p.m., Sri P. Naga Raju, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners, appeared before this Court and stated that by mistake registry has showed the name of Smt.G.Jahanavi, instead of Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the main case was ended in acquittal. As such, the cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
4. Recording the said statement, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
____ K.SURESH REDDY, J
Dt.09.10.2026 Asr
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2162 of 2019
Date: 09.10.2026 Asr