Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1444/2015 of Dasari Naveen, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 8 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.: 1443 & 1444/2015 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1443/2015 Between: 1. DASARI NAVEEN,, S/O. D.V.
APHC010114152015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.: 1443 & 1444/2015
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1443/2015
Between:
1. DASARI NAVEEN,, S/O. D.V. DANIAL, EX-PRINCIPAL, PLOT NO.204, JAI DURGA TOWERS, KAMAYYATHOPU CENTER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD
2. GADDAM GLORY RAMBOB, SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, GOLDEN RULE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, MANDADAM VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased tofiled under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment and sentence passed in Cr!.
Appeal No.56 of 2014 dated: 27.04.2015 on the file of the XII Additional Sessions Judge, Krishna District at Vijayawada in CC No.58 of 2013 dated 21.04.2014 on the file of the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 2289 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to expediate the hearing of the above Revision Case, and pass such other order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1444/2015
Between:
1. DASARI NAVEEN,, S/O. D.V. DANIAL, EX-PRINCIPAL, PLOT NO.204, JAI DURGA TOWERS, KAMAYYATT,OPU CENTER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD
2. GADDAM GLORY RAMBOB, SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, GOLDEN RULE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, MANDADAM VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toagainst the judgment and sentence passed in Crl. Appeal No.57 of 2014 dated: 27.04.2015 on the file of the XII Additional Sessions Judge, Krishna District at Vijayawada in CC
No.634 of 2011 dated 21.04.2014 on the file of the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 2290 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to expediate the hearing of the above Revision Case, and pass such other order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
Heard, Sri Arvinda Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri K. Srinivas, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri G. Neelothpal, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. As the parties to the present Criminal Revision Cases are one and the same, they are being disposed of, by way of this common order.
3. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a withdrawal memo, dated 08.10.2026, indicating that the revision petitioner does not wish to pursue the above Criminal Revision Cases in view of the subsequent circumstances and intends to withdraw the same.
4. As the revision petitioner intends not to proceed with the cases, which he has filed before this Court, having no other option, both the Criminal Revision Cases are dismissed.
5. Resultantly, Crl.R.C. Nos.1443 & 1444 of 2015 are dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J
Dt: 09.10.2026 MJA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.: 1443 & 1444/2015
09.10.2026
MJA