Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/547/2025 of M/S.HSR Infra Projects., Vs Sri. Ramesh Kumar, on 8 October 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 547/2025 Between: 1. M/S.HSR INFRA PROJECTS.,, REP.BY.ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.CH.RAMAMOHAN REDDY S/O.

APHC010089542025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 547/2025

Between:

1. M/S.HSR INFRA PROJECTS.,, REP.BY.ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.CH.RAMAMOHAN REDDY S/O. CH.BALAKRISHNA REDDY, AGE

YEARS, D/O. 505, B-BLOCK,

SAHITHI ESTATES,SARASWATHI NAGAR, NELLORE , ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI RAMESH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPORTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.

2. SRI M V APPA RAO, COMMISSONER,DACHEPALI NAGARA PANCHAYAT, PALANADU DISTRICT.

3. SRI G VENKATESWARA RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,DACHEPALLI NAGARA PANCHAYAT, PALANADU DISTRICT.

4. SRI V ARUN BABU, COLLECTOR,PALANADU DISTRICT.

5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT

SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 04.11.2024 of this Honble Court made in WP. No. 20084/2024 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI

2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities

3.

Page 1 of 2

The Court made the following Order:

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with.

2. In view of the same, as no cause survives, this contempt case is closed. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 09.10.2026 NNN

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead