Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2051/2026 of POKKIREDDY RAGHUNADHA REDDY Vs SRI GOPI REDDY on 8 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2051/2026 Between: 1. POKKIREDDY RAGHUNADHA REDDY, S/O LATE MASTAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O
APHC010294442026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2051/2026
Between:
1. POKKIREDDY RAGHUNADHA REDDY, S/O LATE MASTAN REDDY, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
OCC
AGRICULTURE,
R/O
MUTYALAPADU VILLAGE, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI GOPI REDDY, Tahsildar, O/o Tahsildar Office, Chillakur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein under Sec.10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, for the willful disobedience in complying, this Hon'ble Court order passed in W.P.No.6539 of 2025, dated 07.05.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y L SIVA KALPANA REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2051 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the order under contempt has been complied with. The said submission is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the circumstances, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the contempt case.
2. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.09.10.2026 SR / JS
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2051 OF 2026
Dt.09.10.2026 SR / JS