Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3451/2025 of Dirisala Srinivasa Rao, Vs Mr. Piyush Kumar, I.A.S., on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3451 OF 2025 Between: 1. Dirisala Srinivasa Rao,, S/o. Mastan Rao, aged 55 years, R/o.D.No.24- 14-27, 3rd
APHC010590332025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3451 OF 2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Dirisala Srinivasa Rao,, S/o. Mastan Rao, aged 55 years, R/o.D.No.24- 14-27, 3rd Line, Nallacheruvu, Guntur, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND
1. Mr Piyush Kumar I A S, Presently working as Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Village, Tullur Mandal, Guntur District.
2. Mr Annapragada Bhanu Pratap, Presently Working as the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Eluru, Eluru District. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to notice the Respondents and punish them for their willfull, deliberate and wanton violation of the Order passed in W.P.No.20151 of 2025, dated 01.08.2025, by this Honble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondents: NAGARAJU PULLAGURA Counsel for the Respondents:A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS
AP)
The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been complied with.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 09.10.2026 RJS/SZT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3451 OF 2025
Dt: 09.10.2026
RJS/SZT