Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/29336/2026 of J LAKSHMI BHAI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

reserved for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 09.10.2026 Date of uploading : 09.10.2026 APHC010535452026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO:

Date of reserved for orders : ---

Date of pronouncement : 09.10.2026

Date of uploading : 09.10.2026

APHC010535452026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 29336 OF 2026

Between:

1. J LAKSHMI BHAI, W/o J Bhavani Shankar (late),Aged about Occ Office Sub-ordinate Diet College, Kurnool, Kurnool District. Residing at 87/309A, Madhavi Nagar, Ward No. 87, Kallur, Kurnool District 518003

...Petitioner

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Education Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District 522238.

2. The Director Higher Education, State of Andhra Pradesh Mangalagiri, Guntur District 522503.

3. The Joint Director of Higher Education, State of Andhra Pradesh Mangalagiri, Guntur District 522503.

4. The Principal, DIET College, B. Tandrapadu, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District 518007

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order of direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the in-action of the respondents particularly the 4th respondent in not considering the representation Dt.17.02.2025 submitted by petitioner regarding altering of the service register as illegal, arbitrani and violative of principles of natural justice and also contrary to Article 14, 16 and 300(A) of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation Dt.17.02.2025 made by the petitioner and thereby alter the service register.

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to alter the service register of the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: YERRAMSETTY SATYA SOWMYA

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES III

The Court made the following order:

Whether the order is :

Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No

Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION No.29336 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondent No.4 in not considering the representation dated 17.02.2025 submitted by the Petitioner with regard to alteration of Service Register, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The Petitioner was appointed on compassionate grounds in the year 2009 on account of death of her husband by name J. Bhavani Shankar. It is stated that the Petitioner is blessed with three children viz.,

1) Vamsheedhara Rao, 2) J. Ganesh and 3) J. Jyothi Bai and as on the date of demise of her husband, the Petitioner was pregnant and later she delivered a child by name J. Dinesh Rao. It is further stated the Petitioner failed to incorporate the details of her younger son J. Dinesh Rao in her Service Register. In that context, she submitted a representation on 17.02.2025 to the Respondent-authorities seeking for correction in the Service Register. As no action is being taken by the Respondent- authorities thereon, the present Writ Petition is filed.

3. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Respondents submits the representation of the Petitioner would be considered and appropriate action would be taken.

4. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, with the consent of both the counsels, with the following directions;

i) The Respondent-authorities are directed to consider the representation dated 17.02.2025 submitted by the Petitioner and make necessary corrections in the Service Register of the Petitioner.

ii) No order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J

Date: 09.10.2026

IS

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION No.29336 of 2026 Date: 09.10.2026

IS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead