Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/10024/2026 of SAI WINES Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10024/2026 Between: 1. SAI WINES, D.NO. 12-1-40, CINEMA CENTRE PEDDAPURAM MUNICIPALITY, KAKAINADA DISTRICT

APHC010193152026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 10024/2026

Between:

1. SAI WINES, D.NO. 12-1-40, CINEMA CENTRE PEDDAPURAM

MUNICIPALITY, KAKAINADA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY

ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR UPPU SATYA SAI S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 12-5-27, VEERARAJU PETA

PEDDAPURAM , PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI

DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 533 437

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

REP.BY

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT REVENUE (PROHIBITION.

AND EXCISE) DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 238

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION EXCISE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503 3.

3. THE

DEPUTY

COMMISSIONER

OF

PROHIBITION

EXCISE,

KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 5330001

4. THE DISTRICT PROHIBITION EXCISE OFFICER, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 533001

5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PROHIBITION EXCISE STATION

PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 533437

6. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION EXCISE

ENCFORCEMENT, KAKINADA KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA

PRADESH

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, especially the 4th respondent in issuing impugned proceedings

- Rc.No.REV04- CRIMOCGEN/5/2026-JA(A4)-DPEO-KKD-l, dated 02-04- 2026, suspending the operations of A4 IMFL/FL shop license notified at G.No.KKD/63/2024-2026, 0 of M/s Sai Wines, Peddapuram Municipality, with immediate effect, pending enquiry into the and not considering the explanation dated 30-03-2026 to the show case. dated 20-03-2026, objectively, and issuing the showcause cause notice dated 02-04-2026 vide Rc.No.REV04-CRIM0CGEN/5/2026- JA9A4)-DPEO-KKD-2, as the same is arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and against the well settled principles of natural justice, apart contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968

and A.P. Excise (Grant of licence of selling by shop and conditions of licence)

Rules, 2024 and the Licence conditions incorporated under G.O.Ms. No.210

85 211 dated 30.09.2024, and Article 300A of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the same by calling for the entire record culminating into issuance of the impugned proceedings Rc.No.REV04- CRIMOCGEN/5/2026- JA(A4)-DPEO-KKD-l, dated 02-04-2026, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings - Rc.No. REV04- CRlMOCGEN/5/2026-JA(A4)-DPEO-KKD -1, dated 02-04-2026, pending disposal of the writ petition, and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to vacate the interim suspension granted in WP.No.10024 of 2026 dated 20.04.2026 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. LEO LAW ASSOCIATES LLP

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Ms.Gaddam Jamuna, learned counsel representing M/s. Leo Law Associates LLP, appearing for the petitioner, submits that a letter dated 18.09.2026 has been addressed to the Registry, enclosing the petitioner’s letter seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.

2. The same is placed on record.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 08.10.2026. JLV

Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 10024/2026

Date: 08.10.2026 JLV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead