Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/905/2019 of Seeramreddi Sanyasi Naidu, @ Naidu, Vs THE STATE OF AP on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 905/2019 Between: 1. SEERAMREDDI SANYASI NAIDU, @ NAIDU,, S/O SRI VERRINAIDU, HINDU, AGE. 38 YEARS,
APHC010259392019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 905/2019
Between:
1. SEERAMREDDI SANYASI NAIDU, @ NAIDU,, S/O SRI VERRINAIDU, HINDU, AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION, RIO SURAPARAJU
PETA,
KOTNANDUR
MANDAL,
EAST
GODAVARI
DISTRICT
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BAPIRAJU KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, KOTAVURATIA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH
COURT AT AMARAVATHI
2. SERAMREDDI KRISHNAMURTHY DIED, (CRIME NO.77 OF 2011 OF
KOTANANDURU POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT)
RESPONDENT NO.2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER
DATED
11.08.2026
IN
CRL.R.C.NO.905
OF
2019.
SINCE
RESPONDENT NO.2 IS DIED, CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AGAINST
RESPONDENT NO.2 IS DISMISSED AS ABATED, AS PER THE
COURT ORDER DATED 17.09.2026 IN CRL.R.C.NO.905 OF 2019.
3. SEERAMREDDI VENKATARAMANA, (CRIME NO.77 OF 2011 OF
KOTANANDURU POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT)
RESPONDENT NO.3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER
DATED 17.09.2026 IN CRL.R.C.NO.905 OF 2019.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N SIVA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. MADHAVI DONTHARAJU
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
2. The Petitioner and Respondent No.3 are present before this Court and submit that they are first cousins and intend to compromise the matter, as there are elements of settlement.
3. Sri P. Nagendra Babu, learned Counsel, is appointed as Mediator in this case. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the learned Mediator conducted the mediation proceedings and submitted his report. The said report is hereby accepted.
4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another1 and K. Bharathi Devi v. State of Telangana2, and having regard to the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that it would be in the interest of justice, the proceedings are quashed in view of the settlement. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of compromised.
1 2012(10) SCC 303 2 (2024) 10 SCC 384
5. Consequently, the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tuni, in C.C.No.91 of 2012, dated 10.04.2018, and confirmed by the learned XII Additional Sessions Judge, Pithapuram, in Crl.A.No.144 of 2018, dated 14.07.2019, are hereby quashed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO,J Date :08.10.2026 KMS
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 905 of 2019
Date: 08.10.2026
KMS